VAMatt said:
Example 1 - I own a small business (I really do). I'd like to pay for internet service that includes only basic email functionality, and access to a very small number of websites. My company uses very little bandwidth. However, under NN, it is illegal for an ISP to offer me service that fits my company's needs. Instead, I have to get nearly the same service as the company next door that produces video content. They are constantly uploading to Youtube, sending files to clients, and downloading all kinds of stuff for use in their work. They need access to the entire WWW, and other stuff. Unfortunately, I have to subsidize their use. (This same example applies to my grandma's emailing and news reading subsidizing my heavy bandwidth video streaming and gaming). |
Very informative response, I didn't know any of that (also, thank you for not assuming I was attacking you for your point of view, and I wasn't looking for a fight or anything and that often happens in these political-type threads :)
Personally, since I'm Canadian, I don't have as vested an interest as Americans do, but the topic does interest me very much. I think that the major thrust behind NN is more from the consumer standpoint than that of small businesses, and I think the ISPs in the States have a history of throttling, restricting, or otherwise impeding consumer access to particular products and services for various reasons (I think some examples include ISIS vs Google Wallet, and Netflix-targeted slowdowns). Do you feel the ISPs will offer you the choices that would benefit your small business now that they've made those repeals?








