By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Zekkyou said:
DonFerrari said:

No worries, sure some cases you can say that the person want to fund the game, but that isn't really a benefit to himself. Also when talking about a game that already crossed dozen Millions on PC and have MS as publisher doesn't really need extra funding.

On the second part, I agree that we don't pursue this line of though anymore as it really is quite unlikely that MS would just call quits if they can avoid, even if cases like Scalebound happened canceling PUBG wouldn't benefit MS.

Often the benefit is that the game gets the chance to be finished at all, which i expect many would consider a pretty big up side :p A lot of people consider that a big enough positive that they fund completely unreleased stuff on Kickstarter, and early access is a clear step up over that in many respects. And sure, but if something becomes as popular as PUBG it implies it's already in a state that millions consider at minimum temporarily acceptable. They have put that money to work too; the PC version has gone from early access to released in just 9 - 10 months.

Fair point... and I don't mind guinea pigs as long as they are other people.

Snoopy said:

Confirmed. This game runs a lot better on xbox when you disable dvr. Also, if you have the OG Xbox one hard drive, try swapping it out for something faster (which is cheap to find).

 

https://wccftech.com/pubg-xbox-performance-improve-gamedvr/

So people are supposed to find their own work arounds over the lack of competence of the dev?



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."