RolStoppable said:
That's a stupid article because it forgets about the Vikings outside of mentioning them on the schedule of the Packers. Let me go over this: 1. Cowboys have to win out. Dallas at 10-6, holding the tie-breaker over the Seahawks who will be at best 10-6. 2. Lions win against Bears and Bengals, so they have to lose to the Packers. Detroit at 9-7. 3. Packers win against Panthers and Lions, lose against Vikings. Green Bay at 9-7. 4a. Panthers will be 10-5 after week 16 if they beat the Bucs after losing to the Packers. 5a. Week 17, Panthers vs. Falcons. Panthers win (11-5), Cowboys ahead of 9-7 Falcons. Essentially, a Packers win against the Panthers opens up a more favorable scenario for the Cowboys as long as you trust the Vikings enough to win in Green Bay. I don't know why the article doesn't consider the Vikings at all. EDIT: Packers losing to Panthers would mean that the Cowboys don't have to worry about the Packers anymore, but at the same time this would push the Panthers towards a playoff spot so much that they might phone it in against the Falcons in week 17 and lose. Panthers 11-5, Falcons 10-6 and Cowboys 10-6 means that Dallas stays at home. |
No, if Packers wins this game, there is an extreme possibility they won't lose another game. I don't see them losing a game especially if they carry all that momentum. They hold the tiebreaker against cowboys. I have faith that Falcons will lose a couple games. Falcons love to choke a lot.