Zekkyou said:
That's not really relevant. Remember when Sony was stopped from taking GT5's servers offline, or when a company was legally forced to roll back an unpopular game update? Nope, me neither. |
Server closure after service was performed for several years is quite different than accepting the money from someone and then not delivering the product. If you want the fair choice is that MS return the money in case they don't deliver the real game, because that way they are taking responsability for not releasing what they are proposing instead of just excusing themselves of any liability.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







