By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Chazore said:
DonFerrari said:

I have no issue with anyone saying their experience is mostly satisfactory or unsatisfactory, but anyone saying the game doesn't have severe drops or that it is always running low are blatantly lying...

And I'm not the type of guy that bother much with FPS.

It seems odd to focus on those saying they are fine with the fps, when you just said you yourself are not bothered with fps.

Ark is pretty much a slideshow on all 3 platforms as it is. I'm more bothered by the fact that some of these devs throw optimisation crunch time right out the window, in favour of adding more and more content. 

Not worring much about FPS doesn't make constant deep dives off FPS to be acceptable. And as I said, I have no issue with people being satisfied with the fps on the preview. But the "fine" was meant as people saying the game basically doesn't have significant drops when it's proved it does, to the point of 4fps.

Never touched Ark and didn't saw any thread for it here.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."