Australia legalizes same sex marriage

[Pemalite]

Azzanation said:

There not different. Gays are two men or woman who like the same sex. Incest can also be two men and woman who like the same sex just the same.

Sexuality and Incest are COMPLETELY separate constructs.

And like you just alluded to... You can be either gay/straight/bisexual and in an incest relationship.
Ergo. Incest has nothing to do with Homosexuality or any sexuality for that matter... SO you can stop trying to force a connection between them.

Azzanation said:

Like I said before, what's the difference between two male gays compared to 2 gay brothers? Nothing, they both breath and bleed.

I can use the same argument about you and your partner. You both breathe and bleed and ergo are the same as 2 gay men in an incestual relationship.

Do you see how this is a logical fallacy?

Azzanation said:

They both cannot reproduce etc. Its sort of legal now image it becoming worse in the coming years. You let one thing through than expect more. Sure we have set rules in place. We at this moment in time say incest is wrong etc, just like how we said gays were wrong as well. Rules change regardless if you have your belief that these rules will never change. They will eventually. Especially when we start throwing around terms "Love is love"

We have already established that your slippery slope logical fallacy is rubbish with the sound logic and reasoning already presented prior in this thread that you have acknowledged.
Thus merely rewording it to somehow make it seem different isn't suddenly going to turn your Argumentum ad Ignorantiam into something sound. - So why continue with it?

Don't take me for a fool... I am pretty sure I have been sufficiently eloquent enough in this thread to show that I am not one.

Azzanation said:

Also your opinion on gun laws is your obviously your opinion. To me its the stupidest thing we have ever done, we are the first to blame issues on objects and not people.

Stupidest thing we have ever done? Are you serious?
We have not had a gun massacre in decades. It's saved lives... And you think that is stupid? Since when has saving lives equated to being stupid?

Gun control works in Australia, it wouldn't work in say... The USA. - For one, the USA is not girt by sea... A natural barrier to smuggling of weapons, drugs and people.

It's not just my opinion either, it's statistics. It's evidence.
And even if we have a gun massacre tomorrow, the fact we didn't have one for several decades prior still means it was worth it.

Azzanation said:

 Russia seems to get along well with guns in place, crazy that.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2012_Moscow_shooting

Sure it does. Keep thinking that.

Azzanation said:

Crime will happen regardless.

So your argument is... That unless we can stop 100% of all crime, be it kids stealing lollies from a shop, someone holding a shop up with a knife, someone hit and running an old lady in a car... That we shouldn't ban guns?

That would be like saying unless vaccines can cure 100% of all diseases known to man... There is no point in getting any vaccine.

Different problems require different solutions, if it's a different crime not related to guns, then it requires a different solution, it's that simple.

Azzanation said:

Just like we cant play some games in Australia because there too violent eg Hatred. However that's an debate for another thread.

I don't have any drama getting the games I wish to play, there are ways around it... Like importing from another PAL territory, pirating, VPN... List goes on.