| Azzanation said: Don't be suprised in 10 years incest is legalised due to love is love. |
That is a slippery slope argument and thus a logical fallacy. Ergo. Incorrect.
Do I need to educate you on what a logical fallacy is?
| Azzanation said: The point your missing is love. Its okay for two men or two woman to marry yet a brother and sister or mother and son or father and daughter cannot? Why exactly? There both biologically ncorrect and many religions are against both yet we allowed one through yet not the others? |
The main difference is that two same-sex people aren't going to be reproducing with each other.
Those in incestuous relationships potentially can... And the biological repercussions on children can potentially be catastrophic.
And that is why slippery slope arguments are stupid, because not only can it go as far back as you want (I.E. Heterosexuals being allowed to marry has resulted in LGBTQI people being allowed to marry and then potentially incest!) but you can conflate it with reasons that have nothing to do with it.
www.youtube.com/@Pemalite
