Azzanation said:
No. Gamers want good games in general. Hoping for a game to fail for the assumption of older games to be revived is stupid. This is an industry with thousands of employees. KI was a revival and wasnt made by Rare. Also nothing is stopping MS from using a small team at Rare to monitor Sea of Thieves while they continue to innovate and create. Id rather play an amazing game now than a bad one in hope of a revival of an older game. If anything, if Rare succeeds with Sea of Thieves than it gives confidants to the brand and there owners to create more, not the other way around. Thats silly. If Sea of Thieves fails, it has more of a chance of Rare being absorbed rather than MS giving them more freedom. |
Yes, because MS is known to have devs making new IPs when they have a strong IP they could make a sequel off... sure.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."