By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
The_Yoda on 11 December 2017
Edit Thread
monocle_layton said:
iron_megalith said:

Alleged doesn't even have any damn difference because it comes to a point where the defendant's integrity is already damaged. 

Your wording for "potential" doesn't do much when you condemn the accused like guilty. This whole damn mess needs to stop and "victims" need to take legal actions.

Hillary's trust took a hit when there were allegations against her concerning security of private information.

 

I'm not condemning him as guilty - I'm pointing out that it's ridiculous that people would vote someone who could be a sexual criminal just to vote for a member in their party. 

 

Bear in mind I know little about Moore and even less about his opponent. But you didn't frame the original question very well.  It was stated that the Dems were running a shitty opponent against him (not sure if that part is true) which says to me that if they ran anyone even halfway decent Moore wouldn't win.  your reply was:

"Are you telling me you'll take someone who's potentially a sexual criminal over a bad candidate? Jesus"

Perhaps one of our perceptions may be off but that says to me: "potential sex criminal is worse than bad candidate " not people will vote for a criminal to stay within party lines ...