Tulipanzo said:
| -CraZed- said:
Edit: it was again! Updated at bottom of story - CORRECTION: An earlier version of this story said the bulletproof glass provision had been removed.
Article title now reads (correctly btw): Bulletproof glass provision amended in 'Stop and Go' bill in Philadelphia City Council
“A provision requiring the removal of bulletproof glass from so-called 'Stop and Go' stores in Philadelphia was amended before being passed on Monday by city council. Instead, the provision was amended to provide L&I a three-year time frame to create regulations regarding the use and removal of that glass.”
Obviously the councilwoman is not the minority and the headline was not disproved. Philly is apparently moving forward with this policy,
|
I posted the article after the correction was made.
The bill, which seems to be supported all in all, was criticized pretty much exclusively because of this provision.
This pretty much disproves the point that a) "the councilwoman is not [in] the minority" and b) the world has gone mad.
In addition it would be weird to provide a time-frame of three years for a department to not make changes to this provision, especially since it wasn't essential for the bill to move forward.
I'd like to add that my main point, these threads being an excuse for people to whine about "the feminists" and the "SJWs", has absolutely not been been disproven.
Because it can't. Y'all should get some fresh air
|
Lol, you’re the only one who used the word feminist in this thread. Good job.
