CrazyGamer2017 said:
So the Jews have been there for much longer than the Palestinians but that must not be taken into account, fuck history right? But the Palestinians have been there for a shorter time but that must be taken into account, history must be upheld? Ok, you can hold double standards in your opinion but not only that is totally wrong and unfair, it is also completely unrealistic. Let's get to the real issue here. You support the palestinians no matter what violence and terror they use, no matter what they would do if they had the power Israel had. And you know what? That's fine, it's your opinion so to that I'll oppose my opinion which is: I'm glad Israel have their land back, I'm glad they are more powerful and can defend themselves against those terrorists, I'm glad the US acknowledged their capital. We can discuss opinions rather than facts if you prefer, I don't have a problem with that either. |
| Ka-pi96 said: They haven't been there for much longer though... they literally hadn't been there for thousands of years. And the facts are you support terrorist scum. Simple. |
Who had it first doesn't solve the dilemma. The first major population to the land was the Canaanites, then the Philistines (Evolved into Palestine) migrated, then the Hebrews from across the Euphrates.
The British promised a Palestinian homeland both to resident Arabs and to Jewish immigrants. The Arabs had helped the British overthrow the Ottoman Turks and were promised control of their land in return for their allegiance. At the same time the British promised the same land to the Jews. IJS
