bigtakilla said:
Cerebralbore101 said:
They're talking about tiny things like low poly assets here and there. Also the 720p resolution. IMO technical graphics don't matter one lousy bit. Keep in mind Valkyria Chronicles looks like a PS3 game because it is a PS3 game, but that's one of the best looking games I've ever played. It makes me sad that so many critics heavily docked Xenoblade 2 for not being a technical masterpiece. I'd rather see games come out at a steady pace, than wait around for developers to polish a game so it looks 10% better, just to get high scores from graphics whores. People wanna complain about studios closing down, but then want to go ahead and whine if a game isn't absolute cutting edge tech. Most of the most technically impressive games out there either nickel and dime the consumer, or force their employees to work slave hours, or they just go out of business.
|
I'd rather not have bugs that tank the fps that require me to shut off my system, better voice acting that makes people want to just turn on the japanese voice acting, a handheld mode (if it's on the switch) that doesn't have the worst image quality of any first party game likely this gen at least from a higher budget title, and characters that don't look ripped from a budget jrpg. Fix that and the rest I'll let fly. Hopefully X2 will be better.
|
I haven't encountered any bugs that tank the FPS below 25fps. I agree that NOA needs to stop being lazy and do a proper localization with the VA. I don't play this one in handheld mode, but I can agree with that. 500p in handheld is disappointing. Character designs aren't part of the technical aspect of the game, though. That's what I was ranting about.
