By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Zoombael said:

Except it wasnt the point.

I qoute:

"The lack of domination Sony was used to with the PS3 surely helped themake a much better console with PS4. Turns out competition is good."

 

Asserting, without the "good competition" the PS3 successor wouldnt be as good as what we have now. As a matter of fact "helped themake a MUCH BETTER CONSOLE".

I proclaim? It is you and LudicrousSpeed who proclaim what we got now is much better than what could have been if it wasnt for MS (and enter Nintendo - whoops.. where did they come from all over sudden) without providing a sound base to your claims. Nothing official or substantial logic and reasoning. I repeat myself: elaborate.

I on the other do provide at least logical, comprehensible arguments, not based on looking into a crystal ball, but on what Sony actually did the preceeding three generations, from the moment they entered the business.

 

 

flashfire926 said:
AlfredoTurkey said:

I don't think you can compare a console from 2013-17 and a console from the early 90's without adjusting for the size of the industry. Selling 40 million units in 1993 would be like selling 150 million or something now.

so selling over 40 million consoles is a failure.....

whatever you say man.

Yes, it is. As always, it has to be put into relation. MS planned to sell 200 mio. And this wide gap between vision and realtity makes it a fail.

WTF?!?!

Did they really? :-O