The_Yoda said:
If we are talking startup speed then i disagree with what I bolded. The switch will have you in game playing again before the PS4 signal has even reached the TV. It is almost literally 3 seconds from the time you hit a button until you are playing again. I've always been really impressed how quickly the Switch comes out of stand-by mode. Sorry I'm kind of splitting hairs, the PS4 is fast too just not as fast as the Switch when it comes to waking up or entering stand-by mode. |
Yep PS4 is fast, but not as fast as any tablet or cellphone to wake up. And if Switch do in 3s that is plenty fast... but not that it will matter if it take 3 or 20s to resume gaming.
abronn627 said:
And yet, you’re doing exactly the same thing. |
Nope, I aint assuming anything, I'm going strictly by what he have written. If he meant anything different or left things unsaid then he have to say it... but I usually find it suspicious when people in VGC say they have several HW and buy a lot of games to it then never turn it on, like they have 0 consideration for money or only want to use the ownership to allow to talk bad about something.
Sunstrider said:
But not everyone has their consoles plugged in all the time and not everyone has their TV near their bed |
Fair enough, but then we also have to assume that not everyone will have their Switch always charged up or their dock plugged to the wall =~]

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."








.