By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
zorg1000 said:
DonFerrari said:

And how much more time take you to click home on PS4 and it to already be on the game you were playing before? Or use PSVita to stream the game for you?

How do you know he has a Vita or a stable internet connection when hes not at home?

He is talking about playing in his bad, how is his internet relevant in this case? And I gave as first option just clicking the home button on the PS4 controller and it will turn on very fast already in the game.

nemo37 said:
DonFerrari said:

And how much more time take you to click home on PS4 and it to already be on the game you were playing before? Or use PSVita to stream the game for you?

I tried the Vita option for both PS4 streaming and PSNow streaming (when it was available on Vita) and the latency was somewhat high and the lack of certain buttons did not make it a very compelling experience. My next attempt was with a smartphone, Dualschock 4 controller, and the PS4; the latency here was much lower but it was only really practical (I tried exposing the PS4 through my router so that I could connect to it from data or while using an external Wi-Fi and the latency was so high that it was unplayable) when at home and it still felt more awkward than using the Switch.

With the Switch I can just play it anywhere without having to connect to a network and worry about latency, etc. It is just a much better solution both at home and especially on-the go.

I was able to play some games (I used the simpler ones) in the Vita both in house and outside (on the outside I fully agree it wasn't a good experience, but Brazil internet isn't really good... from what we know in Japan it the system works well for this).

For portability yes Vita is better at playing Vita games than PS4 games, that is know. And Switch offer a better experience for consoles being portable (expected when it had more technology evolution to use).

But the point he was making is playing in his bed not everywhere.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."