That Guy on 03 July 2007
I believe that design would be the complete opposite of chance. Evolution is the development of these things through natural selection, rather, whatever traits helped birds to survive over millions of years are more prominant today and the traits unfit for survival died off.
One major argument against Intelligent Design is that ID supporters focus too much in trying to poke holes in the theory of evolution and in turn they are not coming up with a tested "scientific" theory of their own. Moreover, the argument is that God lives in the "gaps" of human knowledge. Whatever we don't know, we attribute to God. Once we figure it out, then BAM oh right, its not God, its gravity, or "its not God, its evolution" or whatever.
