Azuren said:
It sounds less like you play what you want and more like you're a prisoner to your OLED when you put it like that.
As far as other people not coming in to post about their burn-in, there's a phenomenon where people vehemently defend products they put their money behind. Even if there was someone here with burn-in on their OLED, it's likely they wouldn't even admit to it because they believe in their product. Anecdotally, there's a guy who works in my department who insists OLED doesn't burn-in and owns one for gaming. When some co-workers and I went to his place for CAH and pizza, I examined his OLED and pointed out where his health bar from Dark Souls was beginning to burn-in. He still denied it.
My department sells anywhere from 7 to 15 OLEDs a week, but last week we sold 34. The only OLED burn-in I deal with for customers is burn-in from the first 30 days (return window) or burn-in on TVs with our protection plans in them. Burn-in is otherwise directed to LG, so I don't even deal with 100% of our burn-in.
And as a side note that I'm not sure I mentioned yet: LG does not cover burn-in on their warranties. |
Well, that sounds like a huge % of affected sets and if that bore out throughout the entire industry then surely we'd hear more about it and/or stores would simply stop stocking as the time/costs of returns would negate the profits made on selling the actual sets...?
Where was the deluge of OLED Vita owners complaints in the first month after purchase? The joy-con issue seemed to be shouted from the rooftops as vocally as possible for what ended up being quite a small percentage of effected units so it seems a very odd difference in consumer behaviour... Unless I just missed the backlash (I don't follow Sony particularly closely)
Anyway, as I've said in my other post - I'll def have another look at my set tonight.







