By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
DonFerrari on 29 November 2017
Edit Thread
Replicant said:
X1Gates said:

Not really. Sony is pricing the pro at the correct price for what it offers in comparison to the X. I believe the pro should be 249 with a game thrown in (maybe GT Sport). 

Considering that the percentage difference between PS4 Pro and XB1X is similar to the percentage difference between PS4 and XB1, I wonder why you've never said that XB1 should cost half as much as the PS4.

At launch XB1X cost $499 and is 42.86% stronger than the PS4 Pro (according to you PS4 Pro should cost $249 and include a game)
At launch PS4 cost $399 and is 41.54% stronger than the XB1 (with your logic XB1 should've launched at $199 and include a game)

PS4: 1840 gigaflops
Xbox One: 1300 gigaflops
(41.54% difference)

PS4 Pro: 4.2 teraflops
Xbox One X: 6 teraflops
(42.86% difference)

You are looking it the wrong way...

Since X1 debuted at 499, it was 25% stronger than PS4.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."