vivster said:
What's weird to be attracted to in some cases fully developed primary and secondary sexual attributes? As long as there are 14 year olds that look like 21 year olds and 21 year olds that look like 14 year olds all this discussion about age is absolutely moot. If a person has all the attributes of a sexually developed human then there is no problem or shame being attracted to them. Welcome to genetics and instincts. Weird are the people who cling to arbitrary age numbers that are indiscernible for the normal eye and pretend that they matter in the slightest. I mean how do you think attraction works? Teenagers lust after other teenagers and it's completely fine. Do you think as soon as a teenager hits the magic number 18 suddenly all people below that age become suddenly repulsive? |
Agree with you... being attracted isn't wrong or repulsive... but falling for the instinct when you know it's a 14y old is wrong because of the possible abuse.
But yes, repulsive is attraction to prepubescent
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."
