VGPolyglot said:
I am not talking about a country, as I prefer a stateless society. I also don't understand you talking about them imploding, are you advocating then for centralized management of the economy? |
"are you advocating then for centralized management of the economy?"
the point i was trying to make is that societies regulate the problem of individual drives clashing by establishing something common across all of the people of a society and that is what we call government
for example government outlaws sexual harassment because the common idea of society is that sexual harassment is bad and therefore government enforces laws to curb sexual harassment
and government is able to do so because it is a centralised force between the people of a society
this nonsense you were coming up with about centralisation being about individuals is wrong
just the word itself makes this clear "CENTRAL" or in other words "SOMETHING THAT EXISTS BETWEEN TWO OR MORE INDIVIDUAL THINGS"
on the other other hand "DECENTRALISED" or in other words "BREAKING OF A STRUCTURE INTO SMALLER PARTS OR INDIVIDUALS"
again where are you getting the idea that centralisation is about indivdiduals? while decentralisation is about groups?
