| BasilZero said: There's worse things in the world happening or being made and people have time to worry about something that has existed for a while and has little to no impact to society nowadays.
First world problems at its finest. |
So, does that mean we can only critique the single worst thing in the world, and that everything else is off limits?
o_O.Q said:
"Well, ideally they would have discussions to ensure that the vote is much higher than 60%" yeah i get that individuality is a problem for socialism and communism, anyway who deals with the votes and compromises? a central body right? "I'm saying that it shouldn't just be considered your company" how does your philosophy work if its a single person? how does the centralisation concept you came up with work in that scenario? |
The people themselves deal with the votes and compromises. And if it's a single person doing all the work, then yes he or she should be able to decide on their own.
