SvennoJ said:
How so? The government is actually helping to achieve the opposite A recent ruling from Canada’s telecom watchdog means Canadians could soon be seeing cheaper Internet bills and more choice in Internet providers, but the move could also threaten profits at Canada’s major telecoms, experts predict.
The Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) last Thursday ordered the major internet service providers (ISPs) to reduce the prices they charge to retail competitors who buy space on their networks.
It rather seems the opposite that government is holding the big companies back from upgrading |
Governments shouldn't NEVER dictate the prices on the market. Reducing the price by law will only lead to breaks and other undesirable effects (they have done this several times in Brazil, to try and control the prices, every single time the result was worse).
One of the direct effects is that companies that can't achieve the dictated price won't even try to enter the market (so protect the companies already there) another one is that areas were the cost to implement isn't worth the dictate max price they won't even put infrastructure over there.
Electricity in most countries still are a big monopoly where you don't have any choice from who to buy from and the prices aren't very much friendly.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







