DonFerrari said:
And you know that is basically the government rulling that keep thi very limite number of ISPs available right? |
How so? The government is actually helping to achieve the opposite
http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2016/10/11/internet-prices-canada-crtc_n_12443020.html
A recent ruling from Canada’s telecom watchdog means Canadians could soon be seeing cheaper Internet bills and more choice in Internet providers, but the move could also threaten profits at Canada’s major telecoms, experts predict.
It rather seems the opposite that government is holding the big companies back from upgrading
http://www.cbc.ca/news/technology/why-super-fast-internet-may-come-from-a-company-you-ve-never-heard-of-1.3182545
It's a big mess while it shouldn't be. Internet is almost as important as electricity nowadays yet building a national glass fiber network is pretty much the wild west atm. I guess electricity networks started out that way too with different voltages and hz even in different cities. Humans never learn. Trial and error is our way!
Anyway I can't think of any positives of getting rid of net neutrality. The big companies argue they could make more money without it to invest in upgrading their networks. Says all you need to know, it's going to cost more by fragmenting the service. Maintaining/upgrading infrastructure always suffers under competition. Short term profit always wins. Getting rid of net neutrality is not the way to fix that.