By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
o_O.Q said:
VGPolyglot said:

It's because we live in a society where mean are in a preferable position, and thus the women are essentially pressured into doing so to be successful. It's not like women don't have aspirations and ambitions of their own, they however have to live in a society that is skewed in favour of men and thus have to do things that they otherwise wouldn't do if there was a more equal playing ground. And it's interesting how apparently eliminating hierarchies makes people homogeneous, because having it so that people have to give up a bit of themselves in order to succeed seems like it makes people more heterogeneous to me.

 

"It's because we live in a society where mean are in a preferable position"

we don't live in the 1950s, women dominate tertiary education and earn more than men in their 20s, i suppose this drops off as women get older because of issues like them having kids

 

" thus the women are essentially pressured into doing so to be successful"

i wasn't talking about social pressure that women face, i was talking about one aspect of what women are attracted to in men - success and power... unless your argument is that you don't really think women are attracted more to powerful and successful men

 

"they however have to live in a society that is skewed in favour of men"

how? when sexism against women is illegal?

 

" thus have to do things that they otherwise wouldn't do if there was a more equal playing ground"

again, we do not live in the 1950s and this is another strawman regardless

 

"And it's interesting how apparently eliminating hierarchies makes people homogeneous"

well you'd have to first understand that differences naturally result in hierarchies... do you at least understand that?

 

"because having it so that people have to give up a bit of themselves in order to succeed seems like it makes people more heterogeneous to me."

expand upon this please, because i really don't understand what you are saying here

is your argument here that people shouldn't have to work? please clarify

Yes, we don't live in the 50s, but when the institutions that perpetuate sexism are still in place, whether it's technically "legal" or not is not going to make much of a difference, especially when there is already an uphill battle to climb in the first place. And you weren't talking about societal pressure? So then, you're one of those people that subscribes to that alpha and beta ideology that is honestly extremely questionable. How about we ask the women here whether or not they like being sexually harassed? I assume we already know what the answer will be. And hierarchies eliminate individuality because it forces people to conform in order to be accepted into the workforce: if people deviate too much from the expectations they are not going to last long. My argument isn't that people shouldn't have to work, it's that they shouldn't have to sell their labour at their own expense to the enrichment of others.