| Ruler said: I dont care about almost all of the things you have listed except the enforced super sampling. The Xbox One X is smaller and more powerful? Who would have guessed it cost 100€ more and came out a year later? The PS4 Pro is more quite if you run games. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iDWVp0mfBF4
Of course it can run Tomb Raider in 4K because that game run in 1080p on the original xbox one in the first place, but 900p games not so much. So what happened with uncomprimised native 4K that MS was touting about? |
they backpedaled and said they will let the devs choose.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."
