Kerozinn said:
I kinda feel the xbox division fell into that trap thinking power is everything just because in the beginning of the gen everyone was comparing resolutions and framerates between ps4 n xbox one. The problem is the xbox one was 100 bucks more and at same time it had weaker hardware. Even at 400 bucks without kinect it still was weaker than a ps4 and the perceived value was less compared the ps4. Microsoft was so tired of loosing in all them Digital Foundry comparisons so they had to top the "half assed" ps4 pro and so they focused on hardware instead of what really matters, games. Just comparing ps4 2018 lineup to xbox lineup and its looking really spooky especially since none of their games hold any weight. And this is after 2017 where PS4 had a beast lineup and xbox had the worst year ever. So yeah i agree with what you said. Switch and base PS4 will wipe the floor with XBOX when it comes to games AND sales this and coming year(s). |
MS management said they were focused on bringing the best HW and after finishing X1X they would back their focus to SW. But put that with all the other promises of increasing 1st party, until they really do it.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







