| SpokenTruth said: The republican offers are barks with no bites. They are put together to appear to do something for the people while appeasing the NRA by doing absolutely nothing. And yes, it is partisanship now. Watch this and tell me it's not. As for my final statement, that's not sexist because it says nothing negative about women. And no, giving up guns is not the ultimate goal, managing who owns, who uses, what for, why , when and where...are the goal. It's not a ban, it's a control. |
Considering that the most recent shooting happened because there was no communication between different parts of the system, it seems like the Grassley amendment wasn't a "bark with no bite." Fixing the current system is a good idea before we force everyone to use it. And improving the background check system as Grassley's amendment was suppose to do, might prevent another Texas situation if it wouldn't have prevented Texas in time.
One can argue the Cornyn amendment won't work, but that is because the original idea was flawed in the first place.
"As for my final statement, that's not sexist because it says nothing negative about women. "
Stating that there is a standard to which all men must arise, or otherwise they are not "real men" is sexist. You can read this editorial from the Huffington Post about why that is the case.
|
And no, giving up guns is not the ultimate goal, managing who owns, who uses, what for, why , when and where...are the goal. It's not a ban, it's a control. |
Then why set up the false dichotomy between "giving up guns" and "enable death" only to throw your constructed dichotomy to the wayside?
