chakkra said:
Well, we saw a jump of 8 times in TFs from PS3 to PS4. So If we expect a similar jump from X1 to X2 then that means the X2 is gonna be barely twice as powerful as an X1X. So the gap between the XoneX and the X2 should be A LOT smaller than the gap we have today between Xone and X1X. Besides, when MS and Sony announced they were moving to the X86 arquitecture, I remember many developers applauding the move because that way they wouldn't have to start from scratch with every generation. So yes, I totally believe that when 9th gen comes for MS, the X1X is gonna be their cheapest option to play the same games. Just like Xone is their cheapest option now. |
Nope some of the solutions X1X used would probably make it a PS3 of sort, which never could really hit the lowest price previous console of the company made.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







