| Wright said:
Bethesda might not be EA, but do you truly believe WiiU couldn't run Skyrim? Or was that Bethesda giving excuses not to support Nintendo? They aren't really all that straight talking. They are now, because they see the potential, the money. I'm not knocking Bethesda. I like them, and I play their games regulary. It's just weird to taste all this love for them when they clearly haven't done much to prove themselves so far, outside three games announced (which seems to be good enough). It clearly points that people really, really don't care about a developer's past history as long as the present have them supporting the product. Capcom is in shambles, and they do make questionable choices, but they have just confirmed support is coming, so I'm not sure what the big problem is. The test PR is bad, but I'm not sure why people should fall for it, since the games were going to come once they realized the sales potential of the console. People should buy the games they want, period, not feel the need of appeasing for any company. I'm not defending Capcom's PR, I'm just saying. You say Namco, which has only released Namco Museum and a Ben10 game on Switch afaik. They also say support is coming for 2018. And that's fine and dandy, it's all about waiting now. Should we actively hate Namco because they demanded fans to go to social media if they wanted a game that supposedly was going to release on Nintendo but never did, at the same time that they have released Get Even, Naruto, Tales of Berseria, Yomawari, Tekken 7 and some other games through 2017 but ignoring Switch entirely, or is the misplaced anger only reserved for Capcom? You seem fine with Namco, to be honest. |
They've always been straight talking even when the Wii was setting the world alight they said they had no plans for it where you're getting this revisionist view from is beyond me, Wii U could run Skyrim but Bethesda had no plans for the platform to begin with not hard to fathom.
They have done something to try and prove themselves they've taken 3 recent AAA title release which weren't originally conceived for the Switch and have made an effort to bring them over with a solid conversion mean while Capcom are only just deciding to get their act together. You know what PR stands for? Public Relations if your PR is bad you're going to get negative reactions not hard to understand and if you have bad PR along with mediocre efforts you're going to get lit up by consumers.
No dude Namco when the Switch was unveiled confirmed a main line Tales game and have released Xenoverse 2 on the platform just last month and have announced 3 more titles are on the way they were far more committed to the platform than you're trying to twist and far more involved in a serious effort than Capcom. Fact is Capcom made their bed and if you have a problem with people highlighting that too bad because it doesn't change the situation even if it makes you lose sleep at night.
