By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Mnementh said:
DonFerrari said:

You may think portability is awesome, I do like big screens, still that doesn't really change the game or how it's played. And in the case in point, the game plays and look worse, so people defending it should have a higher score because it is portable (only because of portability, not that the game is played different or allow better interaction or anything) would be wrong for me.

For someone pushing the subjective viewpoint that platforms don't influence the gaming experience, you do have a preference so seemingly it does influence your gaming experience.

But whatever. I already said it is opinion, you still try to push your very subjective opinion as objective truth. And as you start to misconstrue my arguments (I never said anything about the control-scheme of Doom on Switch) it is obvious that you're not interested in discussion. So think your personal opinion, whatever. I see no point to involve myself into the discussion if this is the style.

If i'm not interested in discussion what am I doing here?

I prefer big screen, but I playing on 21" or 300" won't change the score even though I know that if I'm to close and the screen is very big I'm more likely to notice the issues, still changing the score of a game because the size of the screen I played changed is silly.

You include an argument in your post but wanted it to go unchallenged? If the point isn't pertinent to the debate you shouldn't bring it in.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."