By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
MajorMalfunction said:
DonFerrari said:
I would say it's good enough right?

Cutting graphics even further may have let id/Panic Button to hit 60 FPS. Right now, it's been compromised compared to the other versions. Nintendo fans are going to have to buy it at full price ($60 USD, $80 CAD) and deal with 30 FPS in a arcadey twitch shooter, buy it on any other platform, or not buy it at all. Well see how it does in the next month or so. If they wanted full points, they could've given an option between 30 and better graphics or 60 and lower graphics. By all accounts, Panic Button did a good job given the hardware, and time constraints.

You'd want the visual fidelity of the game to be even lower than it already is?
I'm not sure you realise just how bad that would look. I doubt they could even scale it that far back, without completely shifting the game engine.