irstupid said:
Why wouldn't it? Take RE7. IT's the same game whether playing on the One or PS4 or PC. It's the same game whether playing on the TV or with a VR system. But would you not agree that the VR makes the game more fun? Portability is the same as like VR. It's a new way to experience the game. People who play say Disgea 5 for like 100's of hours I'm sure greatly love the aspect of having portability. I'm sure that makes the game much more enjoyabl eto them. What about say a Pokémon game. Doing link battles or trading in person is a whole different expeirence than trading online through the GTS. Removing or adding those aspects are definitely things that improve a game or not. |
Playing RE7 on VR changes how the game is played. A game show on the TV or the portable doesn't change this... If a social aspect of the game would be different because of how you interact with it them sure the score can be different. But in this case this is irrelevant. Or should we give extra 10 points for each game that is made portable? Should UC2, 3 or 4 be over 100 if you play they portably?
And worse yet on this case the portable runs worse than the original.
For pokemon it would make the game experience really different....
Or in another way for me playing on 65" is better than a HH so can I give 20 extra points comparing versions?

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







