By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Nymeria said:
setsunatenshi said:

really? do you have anything to back that up? i mean the part that Microsoft takes 100M profit from Minecraft every year.

do you have any idea how many studios they could actually fund and how many new IPs 2.5B would actually fund?

instead they bought the licence for a game that pretty much everyone already played and got over years ago.

 

edit: even if your figures would be correct, it would take 25+ years of MS profitting 100M every single year just to break even on keeping that money under the matress. not counting inflation, etc

They also have an asset in owning Minecraft.  They could possibly sell the IP later on.  Maybe for 2.5 billion, maybe more, maybe less.

From their perspective such a massive buy may have been a safer bet than backing ten major game projects.  

#1 they are not going to sell it to anyone for anywhere close to that amount because no one else is stupid enough to pay it

 

#2 how exactly did it benefit consumers/gamers to have MS hand a 2.5B cheque to Notch?

 

#3 perhaps if they used this money to do what the other competitors are doing (funding own studios, making new ips, investing in new experiences) then people would actually want their products and be excited for their brand.

 

As I said before, they have been in the business for nearly 2 decades and still don't have the 1st party content that both Sony and Nintendo give their consumers