| CrazyGamer2017 said:
And yes, a lesser number of culturally similar people are indeed going to have less disagreements. But they are also going to be much weaker and in this 21st century world, good luck for a small number of people to have a say in talks with China for example. Again the UNITED (key word is "united") States of America, a huge number of different people make my point of union being better than division. Of course I can't see into alternate universes my friend, but my little finger tells me that, had the US not existed as a single country but as 50 divided states, that not only there would have been a ton more wars inside America but also the ENTIRE western world would not be the free world it is today. Hitler I'm looking at you cause, had my friend Ka-Pi96's wishes for division been a reality in America, i kind of suspect that your invasion of Europe and maybe later America itself would have been, how shall I put it? Oh yes, WAY EASIER AND PRETTY MUCH GUARANTEED TO SUCCEED... Again you don't see the big picture and obviously neither do the nationalists. |
I hope that , if anything, the EU is aiming for a United States of Europe. The US isn't a single country, as far as i know, they just bow down to the will of the superstate in DC and can't do anything outside the union.
Also i don't think England initially invaded any natives, just claimed and settled the lands.
