| starcraft said: http://www.xboxic.com/news/4751 Its not specific about whether the co-op is online only or multiplayer, but either way its awesome. Though its not written in the link, I can tell you that in Halo Wars you only have to collect 'supplies' rather than gold, wood, food in an effort to make the games less tedious to use with controllers. Also, full-scale assaults can be organised in less than a minute. Edit: Also, BEFORE this game became Halo Wars, it was an RTS that ensemble was already making that had nothing to do with Halo. In other words, Microsoft had so much confidence in the game Ensemble were making that they put the Halo name on it. |
Seriously? Someone is looking forward to this game? I have seen nothing of it that has made me think it is extraordinary in any way, or even better then Universe at War, which didnt do well on its own rights. And the fact that Microsoft put Halo on the game could also mean that they felt it wouldnt have sold well, and they knew Halo would make it sell well giving them a financial boost even IF the game sucked. They could have slapped Halo onto Turning Point and re-skinned it and it would have doubled its sales numbers. And still been a horrible game.
I own all three current consoles and a great gaming rig, now thats out of the way.
This space Reserved for the Nuggets of Wisdom dropped by Bladeforce:
"Why post something like this when all it will get is PS3 owners blinded to reality replying? BOTH THE PS3 AND BLUE-RAY WILL NOT LAST 3 YEARS! TECHNOLOGY CHANGED TOO FAST!"
"is it Wii FIt that has sold as many as PS3's sold? Thats a LOL Look at the total sales of software is it just me that sees Nintendo titles hitting 10m+ and you say they arent making a difference? Another LOL!"
"Hell, with all the negative hype Sony spin, people just aren't interested cost is too high and to get the true HD experience (1080p, 7.1 surround) you will need a $1000+ system. THAT IS GOING TO DO IT IN A RECESSION! PS4 will not happen"
