| LudicrousSpeed said: If the responses are going to be these adorable tantrums of personal attacks then please keep trying to "reason" with me LOL. It's not rocket science, breh. Your sources are welcome to their opinions that MS fiddles with the exclusive terminology too much, or more than Sony. I'd certainly agree on the second one lately. But I just take issue with them claiming MS is the only one guilty of doing something Sony has also done this gen. That tells me they either don't pay attention, or they do pay attention and are ignoring/excusing it in Sonys case. Either one is good enough for me, take your pick. Hope that helps :) |
Maybe my message came off as angry, but that wasn’t the case. A bit irritated, yes, but certainly not angry.
The two bolded parts are contradictory. This is the thing. I’m not saying—and neither is that article—that Sony has never done it. I actually said exactly that in my prior posts. What everyone is saying is simply that MS is way worse in this regard, esp in the past couple years, than Sony and Nintendo. I’ve said this several times now, but your responses make it seem like you didn’t read what I said.
Certainly not trying to pick fights on here. Have never done that in my years on this site. Sorry my message seemed like I was attacking you. Just felt like you were completely unwilling to see from a neutral perspective. Maybe should’ve worded my message differently, though.
