vivster said:
Somehow I am not surprised. After all, the amount of money you would pay for a game is the exact same as everyone else should and Nintendo's games are objectively worth more despite having very small budgets. |
It really seems like you are quantifying the value of a game by the cost of its "assets" as opposed to the experience or content of the game.
And this is one of those times whenyour bias takes point over the usually reasonable things you have to say. Eg... its common sense and a no brainer why games on a PC cost less than games on consoles. With consoles, there are simply just more hands in the pot. With PC, a publisher only has to worry about steam (and thats if the publisher doesn't have their own online store. On consoles, you worry about the platform holder and the store.
