Dulfite said:
It does make sense, you just don't agree with it (which is fine). This is what is important to me. I understand this is a minority view, but story is the most important. There are others who feel this way based on the dozens of past reviews I've put on this website, though I know we are the minority. I wanted to offer a different perspective. However, as I mentioned in the review, I include a score that shows what it is without taking story into consideration, which was in the 70s for this game. |
Yeah actually, I guess you are right. Sorry, I just found it odd. I prefer these "subjective" reviews over having the same scores and review processes circle-jerked a million times. So I guess I support this kind of stuff, even when it alienates me 
