By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
DonFerrari on 02 November 2017
Edit Thread
Wright said:
Kyuu said:

... The $499 20 GB model was also fully backwards compatible, silly. And ALL PS3 models are backwards compatible with PS1.

You try to save face now fool, but you don't realize I have you in my claws already! MUAHAHAHAHAHA!

Kyuu said:
When consumers could have supported the ambitious, more reliable PS3, with its free online service, and full backwards compatibility with the two greatest gaming systems [...]

There's only, and I repeat, only one PS3 SKU that fits that description you provided, and that's the 600 bucks model.

There were the Genesis collection, and it had the PS1 for all games, so it had 2 of the greatest gaming systems before it =p



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."