By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
GribbleGrunger said:
DonFerrari said:
Would make low sense to call it Part II and in fact be Part 0.

I don't quite follow. First game Past/Future, second game further in the past/further in the future. It makes perfect sense to me. 

It doesn't really make sense, but that could be the way it is done



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."