By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
SKMBlake said:
DonFerrari said:

it's strange to like Nintendo game without being bothered with graphics to then be deterred on not having PS4Pro to play Sony games.

No, it's not. They don't sell the same thing.

And I will always buy a Sony Xperia phone (like I did since 2011), watch a Sony Bravia TV and buy a Sony headset to listen my music. And use my PS3 to read blu-ray discs. But for now, I don't want (and can't afford) a PS4 right now. It doesn't stop me being a Sony fanboy just because I don't own one product.

And I didn't wanna mention it earlier but I also want to buy a PS VR, and I know it's better with the PS4 Pro.

Eeeeeer what is the relevance of being a Sony fanboy of their non-gaming products on a game forum?

I like PSVR and it is better on PS4Pro. But if you are on a budget as you said best option is to just buy a PS4 for under 250 and save the rest for PS5 with PSVR2 instead of forquing additional 550 USD. To me it was a worth expenditure, but the gap isn't that sensible and there isn't that much good content to VR, altough I would appreciate all the customer base to push VR.

Zekkyou said:
SKMBlake said:

A Switch satisfies me as a portable console, but if I have to stay in front of my TV to enjoy games, I'd rather have beautiful graphics.

But as many said here, if there is really little differences between PS4 Slim and Pro, I'd rather buy a regular PS4. I tought Uncharted 4 and Horizon were only beautiful with the PS4 Pro.

UC4 and Horizon still both look excellent on a standard PS4, the Pro just runs them at a higher resolution (at least that's what Sony's 1st parties opt to use the extra power for). It's mostly aimed at people with 4k TVs.

If you're fine with 1080p, then a standard PS4 will do you fine. If you own or plan on buying a 4k TV, then a Pro is worth considering.

He does have a 55"4K... some games (sony as well) use some extra CPU for smoother framerate.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."