By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
DonFerrari on 31 October 2017
Edit Thread
SKMBlake said:
DonFerrari said:

If a Switch graphics satisfy you, there is zero reason for you to think only PS4Pro will do. Besides that the difference in price between regular and Pro is 100USD so it isn't massive.

A Switch satisfies me as a portable console, but if I have to stay in front of my TV to enjoy games, I'd rather have beautiful graphics.

But as many said here, if there is really little differences between PS4 Slim and Pro, I'd rather buy a regular PS4. I tought Uncharted 4 and Horizon were only beautiful with the PS4 Pro.

I don't know if we can say they are minimal (depends of the person taste); but PS4 already have great graphics, PS4Pro just improve that some. Unless you are playing outside of your house what added benefit does the portability give you that you have no issue sacrificing graphics? But if you have to look at a TV then graphics become so important?



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."