| greencactaur said: Wii U had no games. Microsoft shot themselves in the foot with the original E3 reveal. No used games + always online connection + the focus on TV entertainment. After seeing how terrible the back lash was for the Xbox , Sony turned around, removing their always online requirement and allowed used games. After that they basically just rode the wave of good press.After the Ps4 began selling well, they also began funding good first party software. Along with great exclusives, in every possible genre. |
PS4 was also better buildt...... it was cheaper & more powerfull, and easier to develope for (no esram ect).
| Cloudman said: You do make a good point in terms of the Switch. It's not just it's excellent line of 1st year games that makes it appealing, but the hardware itself. That dual portability/TV play does certainly does make it a more enticing buy. |
and nintendo are actually closer to PS4/xb1 in performance, than the Wii was to the PS3/Xb360.
Because how gimpy their hardware usuallly is/was, they managed to both improve relative performance (to competitor's) while going mobile.
They are actually getting some 3rd party multiplat ports this time around.







