Carzy Zarx’s PC Gaming Emporium - Catch Up on All the Latest PC Gaming Related News

[JEMC]

HoloDust said:

JEMC said:

That's a very sensible approach.

I don't remember if AC 2 was easier than the first one or not, but I do remember that the game world was much richer and there were more things to do, so I found it to be more entertaining.

I've yet to play Black Flag. I promised myself that I would finish AC 3 first, and I still haven't done it.

Yeah, combat was way easier than in first - I pretty much had the same problem with Hitman 2 back in days - you could power through a lot of things, unlike the first one.

And I liked the setting in AC1 much more - renaissance Italy does little for me....that's why I hope they revisit Rome during the Empire.

For me, the advantage of the first game over the second was that deserts between the cities, which gave it something else to explore. But the added verticality and ability to swim of the second one (a weird omission on the first one) more than made it up for me.

And I agree that there are a lot of eras or periods that would have been great for an AC game like the ancient Rome as you said (Caesar's murder?), or the Russian revolution.