Super Mario Odyssey Reviews - 97 Metacritic (91 Reviews) - 97 OpenCritic (84 Reviews)

[Nautilus]

BraLoD said:

Nautilus said:

I know you dont like to admit, but you ARE  a Sony enthusiast.Not that you dont or cant appreciatte what Nintendo or MS is able to do, but much like I dont feel really excited when MS reveals something that gets other people hyped, you dont get enthusiastic with the games Nintendo releases, either because you have been so distant from the type of games that Nintendo makes and the charm it brings with it or simply because you grew so accoustomed with the type of games that are released on the PS4 that you dont see really why games like BOTW or Oddyssey are getting the fanfare they are getting.And lets face it, the same way that Nintendo systems havent received games like Uncharted, GTA and Bloodborne for a LONG time(in terms of tone)(and at least in a sufficient number), Sony consoles dont have the type of games that Nintendo usually produces, either in genre or just in personality and charm.

There is a reason why these games are getting the scores they are getting, much like there is a reason why Nintendo survived this long in the industry as a software and hardware developer.They are really, REALLY good at what they do.BOTW and Oddyssey are not only entries on the most recognizables videogame franchises of all history, but they are radically different takes on such franchises, and they have done it masterfully, much like the reviews shows.There is no conspiracy behind those scores.

Simply put, they are games that excell on what they do.

I don't really get this remarks you keep trying to push about me...

I'm a PlayStation enthusiast, Sony makes great consoles and great games, my all time top 3 has come from their studios, they are my favorite gaming company, where did I ever try to hide that? I make top lists, spread love about the games I love all the time.

I also don't really appreciate MS, that's about their entirety, not the XBOX brand per se.

And still, nothing bout that has anything to do with it.

I'm sad vivster is the one to get my point, even vivster! Damn.

Im not pushing anything.Im just, as you said, making some remarks about you.

And I was just trying to explain to you, as others have pointed out, why Nintendo managed two games with a 97 score.Or why it got a MK with a 92.Its not bias(outside of the pedigree that Nintendo has), Nintendo is simply releasing good games.There are still the "trolls" reviews.Plus, not every 10 needs to be a completely perfect game.If the game outshines and more than compensates for its small flaws, the game still deserves the score it gets.Specially since there is no such thing as a game 100% without flaws.

I just have been extra "pushy" with you because thats not the first time you made such a remark about a Nintendo game without any evidence or anything to point out that reviewers are being biased towards Nintendo.Thats all.