By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Bandorr said:
LivingMetal said:

Well, then let me also add that Nintendo doesn't have the cash flow such as Microsoft.  Also as we all know, Sony was in financial disarray not too long ago.  What helps make consoles successful are the games (or course) that has to have the offering that attract you to that console.  So exclusive will play an important part.  Nintendo and Sony has this advantage as a whole and has worked for it as opposed to Microsoft.  One of the primary reasons why the Xbox console line is still in existence (if not the primary reason) is because they have the financial backing from other divisions to keep it afloat.  There, I said it.

Yeah pretty much. Which makes it all the more hilarious when Sony or Nintendo is accused of moneyhatting games from Xbox. Microsoft has way way more money, yep seems to not want to spend any of it.

They are happy floating the xbox down the river at an average speed.

Too bad all those financial advisors that told us MS would destroy Sony this gen because Sony was broke and MS could even sell X1 for free because of how rich they were.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."