By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
DonFerrari said:
HoangNhatAnh said:

No matter what happen, GTS always is 10 to you so nothing to worry, even if it get 50% score on metacritic or below, it won't change your loyal to Sony and GT, so no need to care about other opinions 

Nope, it isn't a no matter what happens, it is a from GT 1-6 and GTS that I have played they have always been 10.

LudicrousSpeed said:

The difference is my GOTG and Titanfall was just a joke, I even had a joke sig for it. You're completely and utterly serious about the GT bias, almost proud of it. Not going to bother responding to your metacritic stuff, if you can't even be bothered to list these supposed much worse games then there's no point :)

You still trying to put extra words not mentioned, worse =/= much worse or bad.

Azzanation said:

GTS took over 4 years to make, and they are charging full price for a game with less than half the content and prebaked weather/lighitng something FM5 suffered also from reviews, atleast FM5 didnt take 4 years to make and still achieved the same. I hope in your case the extra DLC is free. 

You also talk down on its competition acting as if the visual differences are night and day? (Funny because GTS doesnt offer dynamic Night and Day) FM7 and PC2 offers great visuals and sound and theres nothing BAD about there lighting model.

Sure GTS has better lighting and the cars look slightly better but at what extra cost? Can you ram into a tire wall in GTS and see the tires react to the crash like in FM7? GTS car damage falls short aswell and the lack of road details seem flat. Also the sound in GTS isnt class leading mentioned by many reviewers. I could go on and on about where GTS falls short to other racers. The fact you stick to the only things GTS has done slightly better is funny because i can name many things it does slightly worse and at times simply worse.

Since you seem to love visuals over everything else, i bet you are excited for FM7 on X1X.. Lets wait and see shall we.

Mate your arguing agasint the majority. I dont need to debate this with you. The reviews speak for themselves. As of right now, GTS is sitting on a 75 Meta, its not a bad score however compared that to its competition it falls behind by a fair shot. You said you treat every GT game a 10/10, well that says something about your opinion in these debates. 

Tell me, do you think GTS is a 10/10 game?

So you come to arguee the Meta, so can you debunk that the average of games on Meta sits around 70 and recently close to 75? So that would indicate that this game is around average level. Which no serious reviewer have put it as, independent of the score. Even the one you were so proud to link.

Yes I think it is a 10/10. Have explained this before. I don't evaluate games by categories (because the reviewers also don't break the score per area). What I evaluate is how the game compares to other games available.

No other game got me itching to get back from work very fast to play or will have me playing as much or having as much enjoyment. So why should I take points out of the game for things that are missing compared to GT6 or PC2? I liked the game much more than PC1 and likes more than games that got very higher scores. So why should I score lower a game I appreciate more?

flashfire926 said:

I have a question: have you played X-com2 ? Cause who knows, it might be one of the best strategy games ever. Let's not rule the possibility out. If it's a genre I don't like or don't have i don't have interest in, I would acknowledge that "the game may actually be good, buts it's just not my cup of tea", instead of calling it unworthy and overrated cause I'm disinterested in that genre. Just my 2 cents.

I haven't. I'm just questioning if GTS deserves a score that reads "average" while X-COM2 deserves a score of one of the best games of the generation. I'm not saying it isn't worth the score or saying it's overrated, I'm asking if it is so much better but fail to have any following.

SvennoJ said:
Well, after completing the endurance race at end of stage 5 it said the server was down for maintenance, can't save. I figured I could keep playing until the server comes back and save then, so got gold on all stage 6 apart from the 1 hour endurance race, and it still won't connect. I backed out to the menu at which point it locked everything out.

Instead of the server maintenance message I now get you must be connected to the server in order to proceed, when I select the reconnect option. Is the server back up and am I screwed? As in lose all progress. Is it still down? I want to go to bed, this sucks!

You are the unluckiest GTS player of this site =[

Exactly, it's always 10 to you so what others opinion or even the whole world won't change your loyalty to Sony so no need to argue with them, 1 or 5 or something below 10 doesn't matter, always 10 to you so just ignore what everyone said