By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
DonFerrari said:
LudicrousSpeed said:
But PD said it was GT7 just under a different name.
http://www.digitalspy.com/gaming/ps4/news/a794751/gran-turismo-sport-is-gran-turismo-7-after-all

Not that your excuse works, anyway. You're still left with a full priced but content-lite simulation racer. Also, the amount of play you get out of it depends entirely on how much you enjoy online racing with strangers :) That used to not matter in Gran Turismo.

Feel free to repeat how GTS is a special sequel that should never be judged against its predecessors, it won't make what you're saying logical.

You mean Kaz said you could understand it as GT7 or GT7S? Still it is a complete different approach.

100h of SP content on what is available at launch, doesn't seem meager.

Not special sequel, a spin-off game.

Should we evaluate Fifa Street the same we do Fifa and take out score because there isn't 22 simultaneous players on the field?

Uh, yeah, exactly. You can understand it as GT7. According to the creator himself. Feel free to continue making excuses though.

Titanfall also had a hundred+ hours of campaign play. You just, you know, need to replay the campaign levels 200 times. lol @ 100 hours of SP content.

GTS isn't being criticized for gameplay changes, so your weak example of FIFA Street not having 22 players falls pretty flat. It's being given criticism because it lacks content compared to other sim racers and focuses too heavily on playing online.

lol someone just said you should compare GTS to GT1. The scores aren't that bad that this level of defense needs to be brought out.