By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
LudicrousSpeed said:
Of course GTS should be reviewed as a GT game. It's a GT game. It took four years to make and costs $60. Nothing wrong with expecting fully fledged features and content in that situation.

Yes GTS have to be reviewed as GTS not GT7, want to repeat it another 5 times?

It have more play time than most 60USD games so is content the problem?

Errorist76 said:
Azzanation said:

Wow you act as if there competition falls way behind. But seems graphics are too important to some people. FM7 and PC2 are amazing games. They are filled with content and are worth there price tags. GTS isnt and thats the problem. You can continue to defend it thats fine. They will continue to offer you these type of games. 

Maybe you should read the IGN Review

http://au.ign.com/articles/2017/10/17/gran-turismo-sport-review

At this rate, FM5 > GTS and thats disapointing after 4 years of developement.

There is no real IGN review yet. Just the smaller sister sites. You know why?! Because the big sites (IGN US, Gamespot, Verge, Gameinformer) have agreed on holding the reviews back until the game has the chance to work as intended.

GTS is easily worth the price tag for me, as I’m having more fun with it than any other racing game in the last decade...but Im a serious car nerd and racer and I can totally understand if someone who isn’t thinks that way.

GTS only has only one true problem..lack of content. They did a clean cut. I’m still happy they have released it now instead of in 2 years time when they have caught up with modelling. Ok, they really need to get the offline saving and server stability fixed too.

pC2 and F7 have other problems. Be it much worse controller play of PC2, bad AI, bugs and general unpolished state of the game..lacking physics and wheel support of Forza 7 and loot boxes, bad lighting system with exaggerated colours and sound, bad online and A.I.

I don’t have to read the review...they all say the same. The game looks and plays brilliantly, it just doesn’t have enough content yet. And this is only in comparison to the competition as GTS still offers easily hundreds of hours played for its 60 bucks.

Have you read their conclusion (ign) because yes they said the same, great content on what offered, missing content compared to others.

 

Funny part is he using it as a comparison to Forza and PC... the comment on the review is that polish and detail on GTS is top class, not equalled by any, just that FM7 and PC2 aren't draw with crayon... so he was very clear in putting there really is a big difference.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."