Azzanation said:
The issue with your logic is your making excuses for one game yet post threads ditching another. You used terms like PD being half the size is excusable yet complain about little things from there direct competition. I also havent seen or cared about advertisments, and ill be dumb to believe Adds in the first place. I mentioned above that FM5 deserves all its critism. At this stage GTS is nothing more than a FM5 a 2013 game. You may hate that however one thing you will love with GTS, is those Pitstop animations. |
You are falling in so many fallacies that it's funny.
Nope, not making excuses for the game, I'm fully aware of the differences and what I said is I understand the change of direction and that it needs to be evaluated as GTS and not GT7. The other thread that you seem to be incapable of getting the humour, and go look for most posts there got it.
I said PD being half is excusable? Nope I haven't. What I have said is that they being half the size they having half the output doesn't make less efficient. Can't you even see a difference? If it was for my liking they would be bigger and keep releasing GT every 3 years with 1000 cars.
Have I said you care about ads? What was said in that thread is that Turn 10 advertised the Pit Stop and removed. And you have been attacking at all point that you preffer more cars, tracks than Pit Stop. Funny your prefference in something you don't even play. So should we preffer that Fifa have 15 players per team on field so defense is more tight? Even if we don't even like playing Fifa? You see how ridiculous your exigences seem?
You mentione today that they deserved the criticism, now show me your posts from the time to show that was true and not a revisionism because now you can talk about FM7 and forget about your defense of FM5?
So I understand that GTS is a FM5 because it have the same content? So having same car and track count make both games the same? So should we say FM7 is a GT4 a 2 gen old game? So funny being lectured on logic by you.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."